Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Reda Rountree (she/her)'s avatar

Thank you so much for reporting on this - I hadn’t heard of the most recent study with mice. Animals can contract Covid and develop Long Covid, too. I’m relieved to have validation of this, because it’s a conversation I have repeatedly with people, but usually only the ones closest to me because no one takes that kind of conversation seriously. It’s hard to get the general population to acknowledge Long Covid in people, let alone animals.

I know I’ve commented before on how much your newsletter means to me, but it really, really does. I worry the majority of the medical community has forgotten about us. It’s a relief when I get your newsletter in my inbox and know there are doctors who care and continue to follow the research.

Expand full comment
Andi Hofmann's avatar

It is like CO2: is it indicator or cause of changing temperatures?

Trustworthy, but gaslit, researchers explained, it is indicator, and indicates what happened 800 years ago.

So for the incidence curve of CoV, for me, it indicates how intoxicated we were in the weeks before. Where does this come from? nano particles in air, water, land (thus food)? In meds? NMIs?

I daresay we can claim till proven otherwise: only continuous intoxication can lead to immune behaviour we can see when looking in this narrow field of „flu like infections“.

Also, I resonate more and more with people like Dr. Amanda Vollmer, that claim we accumulate „toxins“ and if we can not get rid of them on a regular basis, like going to sauna, or doing some spring cure to whichever healing system, we fall ill. And can do so “synchronously”:

They also claim, that we exchange signals like „ I‘m doing a detox round, do you want to go along“? Meaning, you have the opt-out option “please, later…”, if you use some remedies or a strong will not to fall ill now. ;).

But then I dived into the wonderful world of exosomes, the universal broad-band communication of nature, and found it well possible, that with NON-INFECTIOUS aerosols, people can exchange their mood, family plans, and need to detox, and what pathogens they have encountered and thus the receiver of the message would be well off to prepare against.

(It was proven beyond doubt that aerosols ar non-infectious, as by N95 mask mandates, incidence was NOT decreasing its slope in a step-down shape, as expected if working, ie. what we would expect if effective. Proving 2 things: masks are non-effctive against spread, and aerosols are NOT the culprit, and we know this from mass human experimentation of “mandating N95 masks”. In real life.

See some 200 studies non conforming to official narrative ( so way the majority of stidies to masks), you can find one or two klicks behind “end mask mandates for good” from world council for health.

See https://www.worldcouncilforhealth.org/wchresources/end-mask-mandates/

The article does not highlight links in a new version. Use safari reader or similar link highlighter to mend this. In need, I will cite them all, only a handful.

Just that “not working” is proofed in trials, where instead, aerosols convey “silent immunity”, meaning a person gets immune without falling ill before.

Whenever a person gets ill on contact, we can see that droplets were exchanged.

Why do masks, even N95, not stop the spread of simple droplet based infections?

Because they do have by-air: masks do lift when we cough or sneeze, and the majority of droplets jet out between skin and mask shooting sideways - behinds, so infecting around the corner.

Also when breathing in, they do not protect against droplets, as on several patches of the skin-mask contact line, the mask is not pressed to skin by some force, flattening the fleece.

This means droplets can slip through. And ONE droplet is enough to convey the message: “detox! Meaning: go symptomatic and fall ill.

This is some aspect of the masks story that seldom gets conveyed, but is truth to me, as it can be easily tested by official data of incidence after mandatory mask introductions, and we have a dataset that is unpecedented, in statistical power, millions of tests per day, and a precise day wher the rules of the game changed: wear a mask!

I estimate, in Germany, many people suddenly wore masks like 2-3 hrs a day more.

It even was proofed that if you receive the non-infecting aerosos in three differrent occations, for a week each run, eg., you become STERILISING immune for about a year, and if the exosomes tell it is still circulating, it auto-mati-cally prolongs. Immune system is clever and saves energy to keep antibodies pevalent, so if the universal communication interface of exosomes ceases to tell some pathogen is circulating, we will stop shaping immunity for it.

There is a very sad aspect that also automaticall imprints to you in a self-evidentiary manner, regarding the deeper functions of masks.

Every time you wear a mask from common materials like PE or PES fleece, immediately, your breath humidity covers the fine hair of the fleece by water.

Now every pathogen you exhaled, and it is common knowledge among pulmonary researchers that exhaling is a toxin-expelling mechanism to detox, will be deposited at the insides of the fleece, before your mouth.

When you breath in again, the masks works like any bioweapon dispenser and produces some aerosol of the fluid coating the fleece: you wear your own pathogen inhaler!

So from some incubation of a few spots of pathogens on saliva glands (1/5 ths of infections starting points) or from throat ring mucose (4/5 ths of starting pount of ANY respiratory infection), you breath out the pathogens, collect them in ape fleece innmask, and PRODUCE some alveolar-reaching aerosol BY the mask upon breathing in.

Consequently, we can read reports from very different city-wide admission rates to hospitals having to deal with severe covid. In mask-adhering cities, it was DOUBLE the rate compared to non-complying cities, and it was also confirmed individually.

Yet no-one in main stream media has dared to declare the conclusion:

HALF the victims of the pandemic were due to masks!

Please proof me wrong, as I could sleep better then. As we still have the perpetraitors of masks, and non-followed up mask “deals” meaning structural corruption in Germany that was not persecuted, as jurisdiction is boun to executive in DE, and executive is corrupted, and still some people obviously afraid (suffering from eg cancer) and vulnerables wear masks in public spaces, so the lies are not debunked, and guess what: “fact checkers” play the most important role to convey the convenient lies that played in the hands of the ones profiting or developing the course of the pandemic, and perhaps the next one, agent x is winking at horizon.

A last aspect is the alternatives:

Please consider “VIRTUAL MASKS” :

If you spray something anti-viral into your nose and throat and under tongue (remember, the saliva glands make up 1/5 th of “infections”), you shall not fear…

I found that the following interventions are hippocratic and have singularly some 80% or more of preventional power, which I state here till proven otherwisely in transparent trials, and use as long:

Inorganic antiseptics: use one of:

- 100-800ppm CIO2 in salt water, use oxidative resisting flasks, no sprays, they degrade to nanoplastics.

Likewise, alternatively, one can use 0.05-1% H2O2 (without stabiliser, as phosphoric acid, the common “stabiliser”, seems to enhance cancer and inflammation; putting supply in fridge makes it stable indefinetely, nearly, some years at least.)

Also, commercially availably (search for mouth or wound wash and fill in sprays, or buy ready-made sprays type “pIasma Iiquid”, uses silicade gel as stay-on;) or DIY hypochlorite sprays are useful. Even NO releasing sprays were invented, and should have been distributed instead of masks.

Thee are some things compatible with these oxidisrs, like xylitol, and trace mineral rich salt like sea salt. To CIO2, you can use a mixture of 1% dead sea etc sal, 0.12% hyaluronic acid, 0.12% iota carrageenan, and up to 10% xylitol. I also added a little drop of eucalyptol per spray bottle. DMSO can be addefd up to 20% without leeching too much plasticiser, and also functions as preservativ to prevent yeast eating up the xylitol. All EXCEPT CIO2 can be inhaled, and much more.

Time shifted,we can use the same base as before for the CIO2 spray, and can add eg chrimolynium acid and azelastine OR chromolynium acid, also methylene blue (up to 0.1%), or borax, to create some anti-oxidative, anti-allergic, anti-“viral” nasal spray.

It was shown that baking soda (NaHCO3) alone, 1/2 %, in salt water, used to rinse nose and mouth and throat as soon as symptoms occur, decrease severe cause by 87%. Some month after this paper was released, we could not buy baking soda in our main sources, supermarkets and drug stores. There never was a shortage in supply, but R value was “contained”, obviously.

You can imagine, that if the principle of operation of any remedy is orthogonal to a second one, in first approximation, we can multiply the “problem reduction rate”.

I just guess 80% reduction rate for ANY of the above remedies, and please proof me wrong or otherwise, so by combining CIO2 and xylitol and iota-carrageenan and dead sea salt, we get reduction factor of 0.2 per remedy, so 0.2^4 = 0.04 meaning estimated efficay of 99.96%.

I had to swallow this for a long time since I first thought about it.

Nowadays the “messages to get ill” by exosomes are very precise, I think that we dis “distributed gain of fuction research”, in population getting mass-immunity but non-sterilising, and I think we have to combine even more remedies like “laughing happily 5 minutes a day” or “walking in forests with slightly elevated pulse 1/2 hr a day“, to stay above 99%. Will not accept anything below:).

All the best for humanity to cure defunct amygdalas, meaning narcissism.

Only able if their owners WANT to heal their connection to empathy and soul.

And eve then, more than difficult. Likehealing ADHD, or autism.

Key is to detox and heal biome.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts